ABSTRACT
The reactivation of latent viruses during SARS-CoV-2 infection is well recognized, and coinfection with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) has been associated with severe clinical cases of COVID-19 infection. In transplant patients, EBV infection presents a significant challenge. Assessing the potential impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations on EBV infections in stable kidney and liver transplant recipients was the objective of our study. Ten solid-organ-transplant (SOT) patients (eight kidney and two liver) vaccinated with standard doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were included. EBV DNA viral load measurements were conducted prior to the vaccination and during a follow-up period (at the first month and after six months) after the second vaccine dose. After the second dose, a significant increase in median viremia was observed (p < 0.01) in 9 patients, and in one patient, the reactivation of EBV infection was found. Six months later, the median viremia decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The EBV viral load should be closely monitored as it could lead to the earlier diagnosis and treatment of EBV-related complications. Despite experiencing a decrease in the viral load six months post-vaccination, some patients still had a viral load over the baseline, which increased the risk of potential complications.
ABSTRACT
The reactivation of latent viruses during SARS-CoV-2 infection is well recognized, and coinfection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been associated with severe clinical cases of COVID-19 infection. In transplant patients, EBV infection presents a significant challenge. Assessing the potential impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations on EBV infections in stable kidney and liver transplant recipients was the objective of our study. Ten solid-organ-transplant (SOT) patients (eight kidney and two liver) vaccinated with standard doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were included. EBV DNA viral load measurements were conducted prior to the vaccination and during a follow-up period (at the first month and after six months) after the second vaccine dose. After the second dose, a significant increase in median viremia was observed (p < 0.01) in 9 patients, and in one patient, the reactivation of EBV infection was found. Six months later, the median viremia decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The EBV viral load should be closely monitored as it could lead to the earlier diagnosis and treatment of EBV-related complications. Despite experiencing a decrease in the viral load six months post-vaccination, some patients still had a viral load over the baseline, which increased the risk of potential complications.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected patients who have undergone solid organ transplantation (SOT). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess a cohort of transplant recipients who developed COVID19, with a focus on immunosuppressive regimen, blood tacrolimus levels, clinical course, and patient and graft outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the first 12 months of the pandemic, we identified ambulatory SOT recipients, including kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients, diagnosed with SARSCoV2 infection. Baseline and followup data on graft function, immunosuppression, and patient and graft outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 2091 ambulatory patients, we identified 201 transplant recipients (9.6%) with SARSCoV2 infection (kidney transplant, n = 112; heart transplant, n = 56; liver transplant, n = 33). Patients after recent kidney (during 2015-2020) or heart (during 2020) transplant were significantly more often diagnosed with COVID 19 than patients with a longer time since transplant. Additionally, blood trough tacrolimus levels measured during or shortly after COVID19 in 23 kidney graft recipients were significantly increased by a median of 76.1% (interquartile range, 47.4%-109.4%) relative to predose trough levels. However, liver function parameters were not elevated, necessitating a tacrolimus dose reduction in 73.9% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, kidney transplant recipients showed significant disturbances of tacrolimus metabolism, which may account for kidney function worsening during COVID19. Moreover, infection was more common in patients with recent kidney or heart transplant, which suggests that the level of immunosuppression may affect morbidity related to SARSCoV2 infection.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Organ Transplantation , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant RecipientsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND There are many safety concerns regarding the use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Hereby, we present our recent experience with ATG administration both as induction therapy and as an anti-rejection treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed all patients transplanted during the first 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic who were treated with thymoglobulin. The ATG dosing, lymphocyte number and percentage in blood smear, adverse effects (thrombocytopenia and infectious complications), and kidney graft function up to 12 months and patients' outcomes were analyzed and compared to KTRs who received basiliximab induction. RESULTS During pandemic, a total of 31 patients were treated with ATG and 59 received basiliximab. The median cumulative ATG doses were 275 (175-325) mg in the induction subgroup and 263 (200-275) mg in the anti-rejection treatment subgroup. Mild thrombocytopenia was noted in 7 (22.6%) and 13 (29.5%) patients, respectively. There were more infectious complications among patients treated with ATG as compared with the basiliximab subgroup (32.3 vs 10.2%, P<0.01), but there were similar incidence rates of thrombocytopenia. Kidney graft function up to 12 months after transplant was comparable (1.1 [1.0-1.9] vs 1.1 [1.0-1.4] mg/dl, respectively). CONCLUSIONS 1. ATG use in the induction protocol or as the anti-rejection treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic appears to be safe and the risk of adverse events is acceptable. 2. During the COVID-19 pandemic the necessary use of ATG should not be postponed, especially in KTRs with increased immunologic risk.
Subject(s)
Antilymphocyte Serum , COVID-19 , Immunosuppressive Agents , Kidney Transplantation , Antilymphocyte Serum/adverse effects , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Basiliximab/therapeutic use , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Graft Survival , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney , Pandemics , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
In our transplant center, infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus was confirmed in 4 organ transplant recipients (3 kidney and 1 liver transplant recipients) during their early post-transplant hospital stay. In this paper, we report the basic characteristics, management, clinical course, and outcomes of these patients.